Skip to main content

The Car Driver Quandary

 

If you were a Formula 1 team principal, would you rather have the best driver or the best car?

For those of you who are regular readers of the blog, firstly, thank you for your support. It means a lot to me. Secondly, this might seem like a weird hook, considering my previous articles have all been about basketball. While that is true, I am actually a big fan of multiple sports, including football (soccer to American readers), baseball, Formula 1, and yes, basketball. Instead of creating a different blog for each sport, I figured it would be better to write about multiple different sports on the same blog.

The dilemma of car or driver popped into my head while I was watching the US Grand Prix this past weekend. While Max Verstappen was comfortably on his way to another victory, the 50th of his career, there were many interesting battles throughout the rest of the field. This got me thinking about the age-old question of whether having the best driver or the best car brings more success. Watching Verstappen and Red Bull lap the field (sometimes literally) over the past couple of years, the answer seems obvious. It would be ideal to have both the best driver and the best car. That, however, would be too easy, and wouldn’t make for a particularly entertaining discussion. So, using statistics, I am going to try and answer this question.

My goal for this analysis is to provide a numerical method to determine whether a car or a driver has more impact towards winning. For the number of points a driver contributes, I will compare the Championship winner and their teammate that season. I am going to compare the first place and second place finishers in the Drivers’ Championship between 1950 and 2023 based on points scored over the course of the season. This will provide a reference for the number of points that the car contributes. In case teammates finish first and second in the championship, I will compare the first and third place finishers for that season. Comparing the number of points the driver and car contribute towards the final tally should provide an idea of which is more important, and by how much.

This analysis is a starting point to determine the impact of the car and the driver in Formula 1, and after I find these results, I hope to expand upon my analysis and improve it further, so that I can provide a more accurate outlook for car and driver performance. In the meantime, comment on what you think is more important to winning and the reasoning behind your choice.

Comments

  1. Interesting how you are trying to isolate attribution to the car versus the driver. And i think you are right, given the number of confounding variables and absence of a matched control, it makes sense to include as many data points as you have...ergo data from 1950. Look forward to the analysis!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Analysis of Car and Driver Impact on Formula 1 Success - Part 2

  In the previous part of this project, I looked at the variables I was using, and some of the trends that I identified through a preliminary analysis. Part 2 of this project is dedicated to:  - The research questions I formulated  - The statistical analyses that I used for each question  - The interpretation of my analysis  - What conclusions I was able to draw to answer each research question Research Questions Based on my preliminary analysis of the variables that I was working with, I came up with more questions that I was interested in exploring, in addition to my original goal of figuring out whether the car or driver was more crucial to Formula 1 success. One of the first things that piqued my interest was how the different points systems affected overall scoring. While it was immediately clear that the change in point scoring systems from 10 points for a win to 25 points for a win resulted in drastic changes to the point totals, my hypothesis was that the change from sys

Statistics To Help the Spurs – A Retrospective

A little while ago, I made a post about how the San Antonio Spurs could get better using statistics. A season and change later, it’s time to re-examine the players involved in that piece and see how the Spurs are playing. As of the new year of 2022, the Spurs are 14-20, with the 5 players averaging the most minutes per game being Dejounte Murray, Keldon Johnson, Derrick White, Jakob Poeltl, and Doug McDermott. Murray is the only player who was in the starting 5 from last season. White, Johnson, Poeltl were all on the roster and have moved into bigger roles, while McDermott is a free agent signing in his first season with the Spurs. The previous starting 5 was Murray, Bryn Forbes, DeMar DeRozan, LaMarcus Aldridge, and Trey Lyles. 3 of those players (DeRozan, Aldridge, and Lyles) have moved on. Forbes, after winning an NBA championship with the Bucks, returned to the Spurs this season. The 2019-20 Spurs line-up had a win co-efficient of 0.579. The top line-up that I looked at was t